Huntress pricing 2026: buying direct vs buying managed
Huntress publishes its prices and requires a 50-seat minimum to buy direct. Through an MSP there is no minimum. The math, including where direct wins.
Read articleEndpoint & Detection
A pricing-first look at small-business MDR in 2026, using only public vendor pricing and showing how endpoint minimums change the math.
If you are shopping strictly on publicly posted pricing, be careful with any article that names one permanent "cheapest MDR" winner. Vendor pages change, and MDR pricing often moves behind a quote form. The number you can verify today matters more than an old table.
Small-business buyers run into the same problem over and over: the market talks about "affordable MDR," but most vendors still make you book a demo before they show a number.
That makes real comparison hard. So this article uses only pricing I could verify from vendor-owned pages or, for Obsidian Ridge, our own live pricing. If a provider makes you request a quote, I say that plainly instead of guessing.
For this article, I only counted an offer as MDR if the provider says the service includes a human-led or SOC-led monitoring and response layer, not just endpoint software.
That distinction matters. If you want the category breakdown, the live MDR vs EDR vs MSSP vs SOC-as-a-service decision tree already covers it. This draft is narrower: what a small business can actually budget.
| Provider | Published price I could verify | Minimum I could verify | What the public page makes clear |
|---|---|---|---|
| Huntress Managed EDR | $8.99 per endpoint per month | 50 seats per product, direct or via a reseller; no minimum when purchased through an MSP | 24/7 managed coverage is included and pricing is per endpoint |
| Obsidian Ridge Foundation | $15 per agent per month | No minimum | 24/7 SOC-backed managed detection and response operated by Obsidian Ridge |
| Sophos MDR | No public number | Not publicly posted | Sophos says pricing is customized and quote-based |
| Red Canary | No public number | Not publicly posted | Service tiers are public, pricing is request-only |
| Expel MDR | No public number | Not publicly posted | Packages are public, pricing is request-only |
| Arctic Wolf MDR | No public number | Not publicly posted | Arctic Wolf says pricing is predictable but does not post the number |
Vendor pricing pages were checked directly in June 2026; vendors are named in prose, not linked. See Obsidian Ridge pricing.
That table tells the real story: public MDR pricing is still rare.
The easiest way to get misled is to compare only the posted per-endpoint number, especially when one provider publishes a minimum but not the current dollar amount.
Here is the same comparison normalized around what can be verified from public terms without inventing quote-stage pricing.
| Endpoint count | Huntress direct, at the 50-seat minimum | Obsidian Ridge Foundation | What I would take from it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 endpoints | $449.50/month (50 seats billed, 10 used) | $150/month | The minimum, not the rate, decides this one |
| 25 endpoints | $449.50/month (50 seats billed, 25 used) | $375/month | Still cheaper with no minimum |
| 50 endpoints | $449.50/month | $750/month | The minimum stops biting; direct is cheaper on licence alone |
| 100 endpoints | $899.00/month | $1,500/month | Direct wins on price; the gap is what pays for operating it |
Two important notes:
Do not let the lowest posted rate fool you. A 50-endpoint minimum can make the "cheapest" MDR more expensive than a higher per-agent rate with no minimum.
At this size, the budget question is really:
If you are still deciding whether you need managed coverage at all, the live EDR vs MDR vs XDR buyer's guide is the better first read.
This is where the Huntress minimum stops being a mismatch. At 50 endpoints you are no longer paying for unused capacity, and the direct licence at $449.50/month is cheaper than Foundation at $750/month. The $300.50 difference is what buys deployment, tuning, escalation into a named practitioner, and the compliance evidence package.
That does not automatically make direct the best fit. It means the buying question changes from "can I clear the minimum?" to "who is going to operate this?"
Now you should expect quotes to move. Huntress says higher committed volumes get lower rates. Quote-only providers may also become more competitive at this point, especially if they bundle broader coverage or want an annual commitment.
The rule here is simple: once you are over 100 endpoints, do not make a buying decision from the website alone.
The quote-only vendors are not automatically overpriced. They are just harder to compare honestly.
That matters because buyers often search "cheapest MDR" when what they really mean is one of two things:
Public pricing helps with the first question. It does a poor job with the second.
If you want a broad category decision before you ask for quotes, the internal link I would use is the decision tree article, not another vendor grid.
If the business is very small, I would optimize for:
If the business is closer to 50 endpoints and wants the lowest public MDR sticker price, Huntress is the cheapest rate I could verify directly.
If the business has cyber-insurance pressure, Microsoft 365 exposure, or repeated phishing risk, I would stop pretending the endpoint-only line item is the whole answer and look at the broader program. That is where Managed ITDR, security awareness training, and the published pricing page start to matter.
Do not compare MDR the way people compare antivirus.
With antivirus, a low sticker price may be enough to shortlist a tool. With MDR, the service minimum, operating model, and included response layer matter just as much as the per-endpoint number.
That is why "cheapest MDR" is only a useful question if you finish the sentence:
"Cheapest for how many endpoints, and with what minimum?"
A closing caution on the word cheapest. If an insurance application is driving the timeline, the number that matters is not monthly cost but whether the control lets you answer the questionnaire truthfully. That is the cyber insurance readiness view of the same purchase, and it occasionally reverses the ranking above.
It depends far more on your endpoint count than on the per-endpoint rate. Huntress publishes Managed EDR at $8.99 per endpoint per month but requires a 50-seat minimum per product on direct and reseller purchases, so a 10-endpoint business buying direct pays for 50 seats. Obsidian Ridge publishes Foundation at $15 per agent per month with no minimum, which works out cheaper below roughly 30 endpoints. Verify both on the live pages before deciding.
Most vendors still hide pricing behind a demo form. The few that publish numbers often use different units, minimums, and billing terms, so buyers end up comparing a monthly device price against an annual user commitment or a rate that only works at a certain minimum.
It should. If the public number is only for endpoint software and the managed monitoring layer is separate or quote-only, I would not count that as true MDR pricing.
Usually the minimum. A low advertised rate with a 50-endpoint minimum can be more expensive than a higher rate with no minimum if you only need coverage for a small office.
Not always. The cheapest public rate can still be the wrong fit if you need identity monitoring, training, insurance evidence, or a service model that works without a 50-endpoint floor.
When nobody in the business is realistically going to watch detections after hours, respond on weekends, or own triage. That is the point where a cheap EDR license stops being a cheap security outcome.
Last updated
August 21, 2026. We refresh this content as the threat landscape and tools evolve.
FAQ
It depends far more on your endpoint count than on the per-endpoint rate. Huntress publishes Managed EDR at $8.99 per endpoint per month but requires a 50-seat minimum per product on direct and reseller purchases, so a 10-endpoint business buying direct pays for 50 seats. Obsidian Ridge publishes Foundation at $15 per agent per month with no minimum, which works out cheaper below roughly 30 endpoints. Verify both on the live pages before deciding.
Most vendors still hide pricing behind a quote form, and the ones that do publish numbers often mix per-endpoint, per-user, annual, and minimum-commit terms. The cheapest sticker price is not always the cheapest real monthly bill.
Real MDR pricing should include human monitoring, investigation, and response coverage. If a vendor only publishes EDR software pricing and the managed layer is separate or quote-only, treat it as EDR pricing, not true MDR pricing.
Usually the minimum. A low published per-endpoint rate with a 50-endpoint minimum can cost more than a higher flat rate with no minimum when you only need 10 or 20 devices covered.
Move to MDR when nobody inside the business is realistically going to watch and act on detections after hours. That is the point where software pricing stops being the full budget story.
Related reading
Huntress publishes its prices and requires a 50-seat minimum to buy direct. Through an MSP there is no minimum. The math, including where direct wins.
Read articleBoth run a 24/7 SOC for small businesses. Huntress publishes its prices and sells direct. Blackpoint publishes none and sells mainly through MSPs.
Read articleThreatLocker blocks what is not on the list. Huntress watches what gets through. Most businesses comparing them are asking the wrong question.
Read article