Cyber Insurance for Dental Practices: The Controls Underwriters Are Asking About in 2026
What dental cyber insurance actually covers in 2026, the underwriting questionnaire controls carriers review.
Read articleCompliance
Six MDR options for a dental practice, compared on what each vendor publishes: HIPAA fit, identity coverage, price, term, seat minimum, who responds.
A dental practice buying MDR is doing something unusual: shopping a product category built and priced for organisations ten to a hundred times its size. Three of the six options below publish no price at all, and the one that publishes the cleanest numbers — Huntress — sets a floor of fifty seats if you buy it directly, which is ten times a typical practice.
Disclosure: Obsidian Ridge is the last row of this table. It resells Huntress, which is also a row here, and nothing else in the table. Every other cell comes from that vendor's own website, fetched 29 and 30 September 2026 and cited at the end. Where a vendor publishes nothing, the cell says "Not published" rather than a guess, and no per-endpoint figure has been borrowed from a comparison site.
Do you run Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace? This is the question most MDR comparisons skip and the one that eliminates options fastest. Identity is where practice breaches start — a hijacked mailbox, a filter quietly deleting invoice emails, a payroll redirect — and identity coverage is not uniform. Huntress states on its own Managed ITDR page that the product protects both Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace with the same SOC. Sophos leads with Microsoft depth on its MDR page. Blackpoint and Sophos document Google Workspace integrations on separate pages rather than on the MDR page itself, and Arctic Wolf and Defendify do not state Google Workspace coverage on their MDR pages. Ask each one directly, and ask whether containment on Google is automatic or manual.
How many computers do you actually have? Not seats, not staff — endpoints with an agent on them. A four-chair practice with six workstations and a practice-management server has seven. At seven, a fifty-seat minimum is not a discount question, it is a disqualification.
| Provider | HIPAA Security Rule fit (as published) | Cyber-insurance evidence | Microsoft 365 / Google identity | Pricing model | Contract term | Minimum seats | Who does the response |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huntress (direct) | Published: a healthcare compliance guide offering "compliance-ready reporting designed for healthcare organizations" | Not published | Both. Managed ITDR covers Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace with the same 24/7 SOC | Published: $7.99 per endpoint/mo and $3.60 per identity/mo at 100 units; $8.99 and $4.80 at 50. Rate falls as volume rises; nothing published below 50 | Published: 12 months standard | 50 per product on direct and reseller purchases; none through an MSP | Huntress 24/7 SOC investigates and stages remediation; you own deployment, portal monitoring and acting on incident reports |
| Blackpoint Cyber | Not published | Not published | Not on the MDR page. A separate Google Workspace integration page states its SOC "detects and contains Google Workspace threats" | Quote-only. States per-seat monthly subscription, "no setup fees and no long-term lock-in contracts" — no figure | Not published (states no long-term lock-in) | Not published | 24/7 human-led SOC. Note: the product page is titled "MDR for MSPs" and says it is built specifically for MSPs, so a practice buys it through one |
| Sophos MDR | Published: a HIPAA solution page, and a healthcare page offering "audit-ready reports for standards such as FFIEC, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and SOC2" | Not published | Microsoft 365 — states the "deepest Microsoft coverage on the market". Google Workspace not stated on the MDR page; Sophos announced a Google Workspace integration for Sophos MDR separately | Not published on its own MDR page | Not published | Not published | Sophos analysts; states "Threats are fully removed, not just contained. No hourly caps." |
| Arctic Wolf | Published: compliance page states "Simplify HIPAA compliance with customized reporting" | Not published as a deliverable. Its MDR page describes a Security Operations Warranty of up to $3 million in financial assistance; no evidence pack is promised | Not published on the MDR page | Not published | Not published | Not published | "Arctic Wolf Security Teams" with a "Concierge Experience", alongside its Aurora Agentic SOC |
| Defendify | No HIPAA product page found (/solutions/compliance/ returned 404 on 29 September 2026) | Not published | Not published | Published starting prices: Detection & Response from $325/mo; All-In-One from $925/mo; final price set by modules and assets | Not published | Not published | Defendify 24/7/365 monitoring; "rapid response" listed under support |
| Obsidian Ridge | Maps to HIPAA Security Rule safeguards; the evidence is packaged, not just claimed | Readiness Sprint evidence pack, $1,500–$3,500, delivered in 7 business days | Both, via Huntress Managed ITDR in the Protected tier — with a real caveat, below | Published: $15 per device/mo (Foundation), $32 per user/mo (Protected, adds identity + training) | Published: Foundation month-to-month; Protected annual term billed monthly | None on Foundation | Huntress 24/7 SOC triages and can isolate a host; a CISSP reviews every escalation within one business day, coordinates the rest and explains it to the owner |
Huntress' identity feature set is not identical across the two platforms, and the gap matters for a practice on Google. Identity Isolation, Rogue Apps / OAuth consent review, adversary-in-the-middle detection and the exfiltration timeline are Microsoft 365 only. On Google Workspace, monitoring and detection work, but account containment is performed manually — by us, within one business day, not automatically at 3am.
So if you are on Google Workspace and someone's mailbox is taken over at two in the morning, Huntress detects it and cuts the session, and the human steps sit inside a business day. If you are on Microsoft 365, more of that is automatic. No vendor comparison table we could find says this out loud, and it is the single most useful thing in this article for a Google-based practice.
Read the last column again, because it is the one that separates products from services.
Huntress buying direct: the SOC investigates and stages a remediation, and the incident report lands in someone's inbox at the practice. That someone has to read it, decide, and act. Huntress says so plainly on its own pricing page — the price "does not include deployment, integration, or the day-to-day operational and portal management that Huntress Partners can provide." If the practice manager is the person who reads it, direct purchase is a poor fit no matter what it costs.
Sophos and Arctic Wolf both put their own staffed teams behind the alert, which is a genuinely stronger position than Huntress direct, and neither publishes what it costs, so you cannot compare it to anything until you are in a sales process.
Blackpoint is built for MSPs by its own description, so the practical question is not what Blackpoint does but which MSP you would be hiring around it.
Two honest cases, and both are common in dentistry.
The free controls aren't on yet. If staff share one login for the practice-management system, if multi-factor authentication is "allowed" rather than enforced on Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, if the only administrator account is also someone's daily email, or if nobody has restored from a backup to check it works — fix those first. They cost nothing but time, and they block more real attacks than monitoring does. MDR layered on a practice where everyone shares a password buys you a faster notification of a breach you were always going to have. (Backup is not something we sell; get it from whoever runs your IT, and test it.)
You are a solo practice already paying for tooling you have not turned on. Two or three computers, no on-premise server, everything in Microsoft 365 with a Business Premium licence that already includes Defender for Business. Turn on what you own, enforce MFA, separate the admin account, and reassess. At three endpoints the honest recommendation is to spend the money on a HIPAA risk analysis instead — the thing OCR actually asks for first, and the thing no MDR product produces.
Both of those are reasons to wait. A provider who will not name a case where you should wait is selling.
Question one catches the seat minimum. Question three catches the Microsoft assumption. Question six catches everything else.
Every competitor fact above was taken from the page listed here, fetched 29 or 30 September 2026. No aggregator, directory or third-party ranking was used, and no per-endpoint price was carried over from a comparison site.
https://www.defendify.com/solutions/compliance/ returned 404.Last updated
September 30, 2026. We refresh this content as the threat landscape and tools evolve.
FAQ
There is no published market share for MDR in dentistry, so treat any ranked list — including this one — as a comparison of what each vendor publishes rather than a survey of what practices run.
The products a dental practice can realistically buy in 2026 are Huntress (direct, or through an MSP partner), Blackpoint Cyber (positioned and sold for MSPs, so through a partner), Sophos MDR, Arctic Wolf, Defendify, and managed offerings built on those platforms.
Of those, Huntress publishes a per-unit price and Defendify publishes package starting prices; the rest are quote-only.
On identity, Huntress states on its Managed ITDR page that one SOC covers both Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, and Blackpoint and Sophos document Google Workspace integrations on separate pages.
That matters, because many dental practices run Google, not Microsoft.
Carriers increasingly ask about endpoint detection and response and about who responds to an alert, and some decline or surcharge without it — but no carrier publishes a universal requirement, and the wording differs between applications.
Read your own renewal questionnaire before buying anything: the question is usually whether you have EDR or MDR deployed on all endpoints and whether a third party monitors it around the clock.
Answering yes truthfully requires both the tool and the monitoring, which is the difference between antivirus and MDR.
What we can tell you without seeing your form is that an application-control or antivirus answer does not always satisfy a detection-and-response question.
Three of the six options here publish a figure.
Huntress publishes $7.99 per endpoint per month at 100 endpoints, and $8.99 per endpoint at 50 on its own in-house-team calculator; it states the per-unit rate goes down as volume goes up, and publishes no rate below 50.
Direct and reseller purchases carry a 50-seat minimum per product and a 12-month standard term, so a 12-computer practice pays the fifty-seat floor of $449.50 a month no matter that it deploys twelve.
There is no published twelve-endpoint rate to compare against, which is itself the answer. Obsidian Ridge publishes $15 per device per month, month-to-month with no minimum, so the same practice pays $180.
Defendify publishes package starting prices: Detection & Response from $325 a month and its All-In-One package from $925 a month, with the final figure set by the modules and assets you choose.
Blackpoint Cyber, Sophos MDR and Arctic Wolf publish no figure at all; any per-endpoint number you find for them on a comparison site is unverified until you hold a written quote.
Not directly at that size, in practical terms.
Huntress requires a 50-seat minimum per product on direct and reseller purchases, so a five-person practice buying direct would pay for fifty endpoints of Managed EDR and fifty identities of Managed ITDR.
Huntress states that purchasing through an MSP carries no Huntress-required minimum seat counts, which is the route that makes small practices viable.
Obsidian Ridge is a Huntress MSP partner and prices per device with no minimum, so a five-computer practice pays for five computers.
Related reading
What dental cyber insurance actually covers in 2026, the underwriting questionnaire controls carriers review.
Read articleWhy DSO and multi-location dental groups inherit the worst cybersecurity posture of their weakest practice.
Read articleSix awareness-training options under 100 seats, compared on what each publishes: simulation, managed or self-serve, reporting, price, term, seat minimum.
Read article